Functional recovery after cesarean delivery: a prospective cohort study in rural Rwanda.

INTRODUCTION: Women who deliver via cesarean section (c-section) experience short- and long-term disability that may affect their physical health and their ability to function normally. While clinical complications are assessed, postpartum functional outcomes are not well understood from a patient's perspective or well-characterized by previous studies. In Rwanda, 11% of rural women deliver via c-section. This study explores the functional recovery of rural Rwandan women after c-section and assesses factors that predict poor functionality at postoperative day (POD) 30. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively on POD 3, 11, and 30 from women delivering at Kirehe District Hospital between October 2019 and March 2020. Functionality was measured by self-reported overall health, energy level, mobility, self-care ability, and ability to perform usual activities; and each domain was rated on a 4-point likert scale, lower scores reflecting higher level of difficulties. Using the four functionality domains, we computed composite mean scores with a maximum score of 4.0 and we defined poor functionality as composite score of ≤ 2.0. We assessed functionality with descriptive statistics and logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 617 patients, 54.0%, 25.9%, and 26.8% reported poor functional status at POD3, POD11, and POD30, respectively. At POD30, the most self-reported poor functionality dimensions were poor or very poor overall health (48.1%), and inability to perform usual activities (15.6%). In the adjusted model, women whose surgery lasted 30-45 min had higher odds of poor functionality (aOR = 1.85, p = 0.01), as did women who experienced intraoperative complications (aOR = 4.12, 95% CI (1.09, 25.57), p = 0.037). High income patients had incrementally lower significant odds of poor physical functionality (aOR = 0.62 for every US$1 increase in monthly income, 95% CI (0.40, 0.96) p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: We found a high proportion of poor physical functionality 30 days post-c-section in this Rwandan cohort. Surgery lasting > 30 min and intra-operative complications were associated with poor functionality, whereas a reported higher income status was associated with lower odds of poor functionality. Functional status assessments, monitoring and support should be included in post-partum care for women who delivered via c-section. Effective risk mitigating intervention should be implemented to recover functionality after c-section, particularly among low-income women and those undergoing longer surgical procedures or those with intraoperative complications.

Safe recovery after cesarean in rural Africa: Technical consensus guidelines for post-discharge care.

Despite increasing cesarean rates in Africa, there remain extensive gaps in the standard provision of care after cesarean birth. We present recommendations for discharge instructions to be provided to women following cesarean delivery in Rwanda, particularly rural Rwanda, and with consideration of adaptable guidelines for sub-Saharan Africa, to support recovery during the postpartum period. These guidelines were developed by a Technical Advisory Group comprised of clinical, program, policy, and research experts with extensive knowledge of cesarean care in Africa. The final instructions delineate between normal and abnormal recovery symptoms and advise when to seek care. The instructions align with global postpartum care guidelines, with additional emphasis on care practices more common in the region and address barriers that women delivering via cesarean may encounter in Africa. The recommended timeline of postpartum visits and visit activities reflect the World Health Organization protocols and provide additional activities to support women who give birth via cesarean. These guidelines aim to standardize communication with women at the time of discharge after cesarean birth in Africa, with the goal of improved confidence and clinical outcomes among these individuals.

Harvard Medical School Department of Global Health and Social Medicine COVID-19 seminar series: COVID and surgical, anesthetic and obstetric care.

On May 21, 2020, the Harvard Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC) hosted a webinar as part of the Harvard Medical School Department of Global Health and Social Medicine's COVID-19 webinar series. The goal of PGSSC's virtual webinar was to share the experiences of surgical, anesthesia, and obstetric (SAO) providers on the frontlines of the COVID pandemic, from both high-income countries (HICs), such as the United States and the United Kingdom, as well as low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Providers shared not only their experiences delivering SAO care during this global pandemic, but also solutions and innovations they and their colleagues developed to address these new challenges. Additionally, the seminar explored the relationship between surgery and health system strengthening and pandemic preparedness, and outlined the way forward, including a roadmap for prioritization and investment in surgical system strengthening. Throughout the discussion, other themes emerged as well, such as the definition of elective surgery and its implications during a persistent global pandemic, the safe and ethical reintroduction of surgical services, and the social inequities exposed by the stress placed on health systems by COVID-19. These proceedings document the perspectives shared by participants through their invited lectures as well as through the panel discussion at the end of the seminar.

Perioperative Management and Outcomes After Cesarean Section-A Cross-Sectional Study From Rural Rwanda.

BACKGROUND: Cesarean sections (c-sections), the most common surgical procedures performed worldwide, are essential in reducing maternal and neonatal deaths. There is a paucity of research studies on c-section care and outcomes in rural African settings. The objective of this study was to describe demographic characteristics, clinical management, and maternal and neonatal outcomes among women receiving c-sections at Kirehe District Hospital (KDH) in rural Rwanda. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all women aged ≥ 18 y residing in KDH catchment area who delivered by c-section at KDH between April 1 and September 30, 2017. Demographic and clinical characteristics of these women and their newborns were collected using patient interviews and medical chart extraction. Descriptive analyses were performed, and frequency and percentages are reported. RESULTS: Of the 621 women included in the study, 45.7% (n = 284) were aged 25-34 y; 42.2% (n = 262) were married; 67.5% (n = 419) had primary education; and 75.7% (n = 470) were farmers by occupation. Burundian refugees living in the nearby Mahama Refugee Camp comprised 13.7% (n = 85) of the study population. The most common indication for c-section was having undergone a c-section previously (31.9%, n = 198), followed by acute fetal distress (30.8%, n = 191). Among those with previous c-section as the sole indication for surgery, 85.4% presented as either urgent or emergent cases. Postoperatively, 67.7% spent less than 4 d at the hospital and 96.1% had no postoperative complications before discharge. Approximately 10% (59/572) of neonates were admitted to the neonatal unit, with the most common reason being neonatal infection (59.6%, n = 31). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that previous delivery via c-section was the primary indication for c-section and that most of these cases were emergent or urgent on presentation. This study highlights the need for further research to explore the feasibility, safety, and appropriateness of vaginal birth after cesarean in rural district hospitals in sub-Saharan Africa.